The ICRIER SETU Framework – How India's Carbon Market Will Impact Economic Growth, Trade, and Competitiveness
Introduction: Beyond Carbon – The Economic Implications
India's Carbon Credit Trading Scheme (CCTS) is often discussed in environmental terms: emission reductions, carbon pricing, and climate action. But there is another dimension that is equally important—the economic dimension.
The CCTS will have profound implications for economic growth, sectoral output, employment, trade, and competitiveness. As the Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations (ICRIER) has noted, understanding these implications is essential for designing a market that delivers climate action without undermining economic development.
The ICRIER study, "Simulating Emissions Trading: a Unified Framework (SETU)," aims to assess the economy-wide impacts of the CCTS on economic growth, sectoral output, employment, trade, and competitiveness. India notified the Carbon Credit Trading Scheme (CCTS) 2023 to establish the legal framework for a national carbon market, supporting the country's transition to a low-carbon economy.
The stakes are high. The India carbon credit market is estimated to be valued at USD 5.90 billion in 2026 and is expected to reach USD 66.79 billion by 2033, exhibiting a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 41.4%. The CCTS compliance covers nine 'hard-to-abate' sectors: iron and steel, cement, aluminium, fertilisers, petrochemicals, textiles, pulp and paper, chlor-alkali, and refineries, which together contribute roughly 15–20 per cent of India's total greenhouse gas emission.
This guide examines the economic implications of India's carbon market, drawing on the ICRIER SETU framework and other analyses, and what they mean for businesses and policymakers.
What Is the ICRIER SETU Framework?
The Study
The ICRIER study, "Simulating Emissions Trading: a Unified Framework (SETU)," is a comprehensive analysis of the economy-wide impacts of the CCTS. The proposed study aims to:
- Assess the economy-wide impacts of the CCTS on economic growth
- Analyse sectoral output impacts
- Evaluate employment implications
- Assess trade and competitiveness impacts
- Inform policy design
The Timing
The study is being conducted during a critical period: August 2026 - February 2027. The findings will inform policy decisions as the CCTS moves into its operational phase.
The Context
India notified the Carbon Credit Trading Scheme (CCTS) 2023 to establish the legal framework for a national carbon market, supporting the country's transition to a low-carbon economy. The CCTS adopts a baseline-and-credit system with facility-level intensity targets, allowing emissions to scale with economic growth while rewarding firms that outperform their benchmarks.
The Research Questions
The SETU framework seeks to answer critical questions:
| Question | Why It Matters |
|---|---|
| How will the CCTS affect economic growth? | Growth is a key policy priority |
| Which sectors will be most affected? | Sectoral impacts vary significantly |
| What are the employment implications? | Jobs are a critical concern |
| How will the CCTS affect trade competitiveness? | Exporters face carbon border taxes |
| What policy adjustments are needed? | Design choices matter |
The CCTS and Economic Growth: A Balancing Act
The Growth-Emissions Trade-off
India faces a fundamental challenge: how to continue economic growth while reducing emissions. The CCTS adopts an intensity-based approach—linking emissions targets to output rather than imposing absolute caps. This accommodates economic growth while creating incentives for efficiency.
The Intensity-Based Design
The intensity-based design means that allowable emissions rise alongside production output, meaning both credit supply and demand can increase simultaneously. This is a pragmatic approach for an emerging economy that needs to grow.
The CCTS Compliance Sectors
The CCTS compliance covers nine 'hard-to-abate' sectors: iron and steel, cement, aluminium, fertilisers, petrochemicals, textiles, pulp and paper, chlor-alkali, and refineries, which together contribute roughly 15–20 per cent of India's total greenhouse gas emission.
The Growth Impact
| Factor | Impact on Growth |
|---|---|
| Compliance Costs | Reduce profitability and investment |
| Technology Investment | Can drive innovation and productivity |
| Carbon Revenue | Surplus credits create new revenue streams |
| Export Competitiveness | CBAM exposure affects exports |
The ICRIER Assessment
The ICRIER study will assess the economy-wide impacts of the CCTS on economic growth. The findings will be critical for understanding whether the CCTS can deliver climate action without undermining economic development.
Sectoral Output Impacts: Winners and Losers
The Hard-to-Abate Sectors
The CCTS covers nine 'hard-to-abate' sectors:
| Sector | Share of India's GHG Emissions | Reduction Required |
|---|---|---|
| Iron and Steel | Significant | 2.1-9.3% |
| Cement | Significant | 4.7-7.6% |
| Aluminium | Moderate | 2.8-7.06% |
| Fertilisers | Moderate | ~25 MtCO₂/year |
| Petrochemicals | Moderate | Notified targets |
| Textiles | Moderate | 3-7% |
| Pulp and Paper | Moderate | Up to 15% |
| Chlor-Alkali | Small | 3.3-11% |
| Refineries | Significant | Notified targets |
The Sectoral Impact
| Sector | Impact | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| Cement | High | Process emissions, hard-to-abate |
| Steel | High | High emissions intensity, CBAM exposure |
| Aluminium | Medium-High | Energy-intensive, CBAM exposure |
| Fertiliser | Medium | Ammonia emissions, green hydrogen opportunity |
| Refineries | Medium | Complex emissions, hydrogen opportunity |
| Textiles | Medium | Moderate emissions, growing pressure |
The Output Implications
| Factor | Impact |
|---|---|
| Compliance Costs | Reduce profitability, potentially output |
| Technology Investment | Can improve productivity and competitiveness |
| Carbon Revenue | Surplus credits create new revenue streams |
| Export Competitiveness | CBAM exposure affects exports |
Employment Implications: Jobs in the Transition
The Employment Challenge
The transition to a low-carbon economy will have significant employment implications. Some sectors will lose jobs; others will gain jobs. The net impact depends on policy design and the pace of transition.
The Employment Impact by Sector
| Sector | Employment Impact |
|---|---|
| High-Carbon Industries | Potential job losses as emissions are reduced |
| Renewable Energy | Significant job creation |
| Energy Efficiency | Job creation in retrofitting and consulting |
| Carbon Markets | New jobs in trading, verification, advisory |
| Green Hydrogen | New jobs in production and infrastructure |
The ICRIER Assessment
The ICRIER study will assess the employment implications of the CCTS. This is critical for understanding how to manage the transition and ensure that no one is left behind.
The Just Transition Imperative
Just Transition is the principle that the transition to a low-carbon economy should be fair and inclusive, ensuring that no one is left behind. This is particularly important for coal-dependent regions and industrial workers.
The Union Budget 2026 Allocation
The Union Budget 2026 allocated ₹20,000 crore for Carbon Capture and Utilisation (CCU) in hard-to-abate sectors, indicating a focus on transitioning these sectors while protecting jobs.
Trade and Competitiveness: The CBAM Connection
The CBAM Reality
India's steel and aluminium exports to the European Union (EU) fell 24.4% in financial year (FY) 2025, declining from USD 7.71 billion in FY24 to USD 5.82 billion in FY25. Indian steel and aluminium exports are likely to face a major competitiveness challenge starting January 1, 2026, as the EU's CBAM shifts from a reporting-only phase to a regime linked to actual payments.
The Price Pressure
Indian steel and aluminium exporters to the EU market have been forced to cut prices by 15-22 per cent to absorb the tax burden since January 1, 2026.
The CBAM Tax Burden
Under the EU's Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), Indian exports of steel, aluminium, and cement to the EU could face tariffs of 20-35 per cent.
The Export Response
Indian steel exports surged by 36 percent year-on-year in the first 10 months of FY2026, primarily driven by frontloading of shipments to the EU before CBAM took effect. This frontloading is a temporary response, not a sustainable strategy.
The ICRIER Assessment
The ICRIER study will assess trade and competitiveness impacts of the CCTS. This is critical for understanding how to protect India's export competitiveness in a carbon-constrained world.
The Strategic Imperative
A credible domestic carbon market can strengthen India's long-term industrial competitiveness. International experience points to the design choices—from benchmark calibration to the eventual role of auctioning—that shape how much carbon value is retained at home.
The Hard-to-Abate Sectors: Where the Impact Is Greatest
Cement
Cement manufacturing is one of the most carbon-intensive industrial processes. Approximately 60% of cement emissions come from the chemical process itself—the calcination of limestone into clinker releases CO₂ as a byproduct. Even if a cement plant switches entirely to renewable energy, it still cannot eliminate its core process emissions.
Steel
India has notified draft emission-intensity targets for 255 iron and steel units under the CCTS. As of 2023-24, the average emission intensity per tonne of crude steel produced in India was 2.54 tonnes of CO₂, while the global average stands at 1.9 tonnes of CO₂.
Fertiliser
The fertiliser sector emits approximately 25 million tonnes of CO₂ annually, with 95% of these emissions coming from ammonia production. Green hydrogen offers a transformative solution.
The Decarbonisation Pathways
| Sector | Primary Pathways |
|---|---|
| Cement | Blended cement, alternative fuels, CCUS |
| Steel | Scrap-based EAF, green hydrogen DRI, CCUS |
| Fertiliser | Green hydrogen, energy efficiency |
| Refineries | Green hydrogen, energy efficiency, CCUS |
The Role of Carbon Credits
For these hard-to-abate sectors, carbon credits will play a critical role in managing residual emissions while long-term technological solutions are developed and scaled.
The Power Sector Exclusion: A Significant Gap
The Scale of the Gap
The power sector accounts for nearly 40% of India's greenhouse gas emissions but remains outside the initial CCTS compliance boundary.
Why This Matters
| Effect | Implication |
|---|---|
| Largest emitter excluded | Single biggest source of emissions not covered |
| Weakened price signal | Reduced demand for credits |
| Incomplete market | Missing the primary channel through which carbon pricing shapes energy investment |
| Competitive distortion | Power sector faces no carbon compliance costs |
The Integration Challenge
As the CCTS matures, future integration of the power sector will benefit from careful consideration of electricity market regulation, dispatch decisions, and cost recovery mechanisms.
The Impact on Economic Analysis
The power sector exclusion means that the ICRIER SETU framework must account for this significant gap in its economic modelling. The economic impacts of the CCTS are incomplete without considering the power sector.
The Investment Requirements: Trillions, Not Billions
The Scale of Investment Needed
India's transition to net-zero will require trillions of dollars in investment across energy, industry, transport, and agriculture. The carbon market alone cannot finance this transition, but it can mobilise private capital and create price signals that guide investment decisions.
The Carbon Market Contribution
The India carbon credit market is estimated to be valued at USD 5.90 billion in 2026, surging to USD 66.79 billion by 2033—a CAGR of 41.4%.
The Investment Opportunity
| Sector | Investment Need |
|---|---|
| Renewable Energy | Trillions for solar, wind, and storage |
| Industrial Decarbonisation | Billions for efficiency, fuel switching, CCUS |
| Green Hydrogen | Significant investment in production and infrastructure |
| Carbon Removal | Billions for nature-based and technological removals |
The Union Budget 2026 Allocation
The Union Budget 2026 allocated ₹20,000 crore for Carbon Capture and Utilisation (CCU) in hard-to-abate sectors, indicating a focus on transitioning these sectors.
The Role of Financial Institutions
Financial intermediation is what eventually turns a compliance market into one with continuous price discovery and hedging. The legal framework for it already exists in India.
The Role of Technology in Mitigating Economic Impacts
Digital MRV
Digital MRV (dMRV) using AI, IoT sensors, and blockchain will reduce the cost and improve the accuracy of emissions monitoring and verification. This will lower compliance costs and improve market efficiency.
AI for Carbon Estimation
Machine learning is being used to estimate emissions and carbon sequestration with greater accuracy than traditional methods. This reduces uncertainty and improves market confidence.
Blockchain for Transparency
Blockchain technology will play an increasing role in ensuring transparency, preventing double counting, and building trust in carbon credits.
Clean Technology Investment
Investment in clean technologies—green hydrogen, CCUS, renewable energy, and energy efficiency—will reduce compliance costs and improve competitiveness.
The ICRIER Assessment
The ICRIER SETU framework will assess how technology can mitigate the economic impacts of the CCTS.
The International Experience: Learning from Others
The EU Experience
The EU ETS spent its first decade plagued by oversupply and weak price signals. The recovery came only after structural reforms, notably the Market Stability Reserve. India can learn from the EU's experience and embed a stability mechanism from the start.
The China Experience
China's national ETS initially focused on the power sector, recognising its importance for market development. Like India's CCTS, China's ETS initially adopted an intensity-based approach.
The California Experience
California's cap-and-trade program demonstrates the potential for linking carbon markets across jurisdictions and expanding sectoral coverage over time.
The Lesson for India
India has the advantage of learning from the costly missteps of earlier movers. The CCTS can avoid the oversupply, weak price signals, and enforcement failures that have challenged carbon markets worldwide.
Policy Recommendations: What Needs to Change
Recommendation 1: Strengthen Enforcement
| Action | Why It Matters |
|---|---|
| Independent Regulator | Real enforcement authority |
| Meaningful Penalties | Penalties must deter non-compliance |
| Consistent Enforcement | No exceptions, no delays |
Recommendation 2: Implement a Price Stability Mechanism
| Action | Why It Matters |
|---|---|
| Price Floor | Prevents price collapse |
| Supply Adjustment | Automatic supply adjustment |
| Market Stability Reserve | Limits oversupply |
Recommendation 3: Include the Power Sector
| Action | Why It Matters |
|---|---|
| Power Sector Integration | Complete the carbon price signal |
| Regulatory Coordination | Align carbon and electricity regulation |
Recommendation 4: Support Affected Sectors
| Action | Why It Matters |
|---|---|
| Just Transition | Protect workers and communities |
| Technology Investment | Support low-carbon technology deployment |
| Capacity Building | Build technical capacity |
Recommendation 5: Strengthen the CBAM Response
| Action | Why It Matters |
|---|---|
| CCTS-Calibration | Domestic carbon costs credited at the border |
| FTA Engagement | Leverage the India-EU FTA CBAM annexure |
Conclusion: Managing the Transition
India's Carbon Credit Trading Scheme will have profound economic implications. The ICRIER SETU framework is essential for understanding these implications and designing policies that deliver climate action without undermining economic development.
Key Takeaways
| Aspect | What You Need to Know |
|---|---|
| ICRIER SETU | Economy-wide impacts of CCTS |
| Sectors Covered | 9 hard-to-abate sectors, 15-20% of emissions |
| CBAM Impact | 24.4% export decline in FY 2025 |
| Power Sector | 40% of emissions excluded |
| Market Size | USD 5.90B in 2026, USD 66.79B by 2033 |
The Choice Is Yours
| Option | Outcome |
|---|---|
| Understand the economic implications | Position your business for success, capitalise on opportunities |
| Ignore the economic implications | Face higher costs, missed opportunities, competitive disadvantage |
How Carboned.in can help
Our team covers every dimension of India's carbon market — pick the service that matches where you are.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the ICRIER SETU framework?+
A study by the Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations assessing the economy-wide impacts of the CCTS.
What sectors are covered by the CCTS?+
Nine 'hard-to-abate' sectors: iron and steel, cement, aluminium, fertilisers, petrochemicals, textiles, pulp and paper, chlor-alkali, and refineries.
How will the CCTS affect economic growth?+
The CCTS adopts an intensity-based approach, accommodating economic growth while creating incentives for efficiency.
What is the CBAM impact on Indian exports?+
India's steel and aluminium exports to the EU fell 24.4% in FY 2025.
What is the investment required?+
Trillions of dollars across energy, industry, transport, and agriculture.
What is the power sector exclusion?+
The power sector accounts for nearly 40% of emissions but is excluded from the CCTS.
What is the ICRIER study timeline?+
August 2026 - February 2027.
How can Carboned.in help?+
We provide economic impact assessment, compliance support, credit procurement, CBAM readiness, and strategic advisory.
Siddharth Gupta is the founder of Carboned.in and specialist counsel for India's carbon compliance framework — advising obligated entities, project developers, and buyers on CCTS, CR-I registration, and credit transactions.